Wind Power Comes of Age

Wind power is not only the fastest growing source of electricity in the U.S. Wind's best kept secret is that it's also the cheapest source of electricity. From my latest stories in Sierra Magazine:
Wind power, which has plenty of construction and maintenance costs but no fuel costs at all, now ranks among the cheapest energy sources, according to separate analyses by the U.S. Energy Information Agency and the global investment bank Lazard, whose annual Levelized Cost of Energy Comparison is an industry staple. And that's not because of federal subsidies and credits. The latest figures show that when the effects of subsidies that all energy industries receive are stripped away, wind power beats everything else, natural gas included. This dramatic calculation has been largely left out of the nation's energy debate, allowing the image of wind as expensive and impractical to persist.
Many states are investing heavily in wind, such as Iowa, where farmers like Randy Caviness have turned it into a second crop. Twenty percent of Iowa's generating capacity is now wind-based.

According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, there is enough prime windy land—away from cities, suburbs, and environmentally sensitive areas—to produce all 4.1 million gigawatt-hours of power that the United States generated in 2011 nine times over. That's a lot of low-cost power left on the table. Makes you wonder who's behind the recent anti-wind campaign to convince Americans that wind is too expensive and inefficient...

Garbology Goes to College

Terrific news: Cal State University Northridge has selected Garbology as this fall's common read for incoming freshmen -- with the book nominated and chosen by faculty, staff and students. I'm looking forward to speaking with the 4,000 freshmen at the university convocation in September.

This is what Learning Resource Center staffer Debbi Mercado wrote in nominating Garbology:
"I think the book could result in a number of interesting campus projects and leave us all with a sense of empowerment and a desire to make some changes in our daily lives. . . . it provides great fodder for classroom discussions and even personal reflections about consumerism, waste, environmental issues, values, the daunting math of it all, and how we might each change our trash habits."


The Champion of Plastic Bags

Stephen L. Joseph is pacing the halls and stairways of the San Luis Obispo County Courthouse, having just wrangled a brief break and an extra fifteen minutes for his closing statement from an increasingly impatient judge. Now as he wanders distractedly, he rehearses his best lines against a type of environmental ordinance that cities and counties across California and the nation are adopting.

"The thing is, I feel I am the true environmentalist here, because I'm only interested in the truth - solid science, solid facts," says the Tiburon-based attorney, whose native British accent is still detectable after more than three decades of U.S. citizenship.

No, Joseph is not battling over massive solar farms in delicate desert habitats. Nor is his case about erecting wind turbines in the flight paths of migratory birds. Rather, Joseph's mission is to save the plastic shopping bag from extinction....

Read more about the campaign to ban plastic bags - and the man whose job is to bag the bans - in my latest California Lawyer magazine article, as well as in Garbology: Our Dirty Love Affair with Trash.

McGovern: On honor, service & the GI Bill

George McGovern, the gracious, intelligent leader and aged war hero, former presidential candidate and retired senator, has died.

I interviewed McGovern while working on my book Over Here: How the GI Bill Transformed the American Dream. He told me his career in the Senate and 1972 run for the presidency were made possible in large part by his military service and the G.I. Bill, which (as it had done for so many other members of the "Greatest Generation") enabled him to rise from humble origins to become a national leader. He once said:

 “If, in fact, we were anything close to the greatest generation, its probably the result of three factors. We were honed and toughened by the Great Depression for ten years prior to World War II. Nobody had a dollar. There weren't any rich people; we were all poor in the 1930s. And then the war itself — we believed in it. We had a clear mission, and we executed it. So that gave us a sense of self- confidence. The third thing… is the G.I. Bill of Rights. That's one of the most marvelous things the federal government has ever done, is to offer these sixteen million people who fought in World War II a chance to go to any college of their choice. I went all the way through Northwestern University to a Ph.D. in American history. It changed my life.”

Here's a brief excerpt about McGovern from Over Here, which will be re-published in eBook format later this year:

McGovern, the South Dakota preacher’s son, went from university professor after the war to Congress and then the Senate for eighteen years. He ran for president as the Democratic nominee in 1972, the campaign that defined his career. Incumbent President Richard Nixon, mired in Vietnam and soon to be driven from office by the Watergate scandal, defeated McGovern in a landslide by successfully painting him as a dangerously radical “peacenik” for opposing the war in Vietnam. That cartoon portrait has stuck for decades, as McGovern’s name, to this day, is used as a warning to Democratic politicians who consider embracing liberal or dovish ideas: Don’t pull a McGovern.

The problem with this view, of course, is that McGovern was right. A decade before most anyone else in the national leadership, he understood the truth of Vietnam and, more importantly, was willing to speak it: that the war was an unmitigated disaster, a poisonous cauldron of bad policy, bad tactics, bad intelligence, a misuse of brave servicemen, the needless destruction of more than two million Vietnamese and sixty thousand American lives, and an alliance with a corrupt and unpopular regime that was doomed to fail. As McGovern predicted, it finally ended badly, with a shameful retreat that Nixon insisted on calling, “Peace With Honor,” though it soon left a communist regime in total control of the country and our former allies in chains or in exile. That the war was a mistake is now overwhelmingly accepted as obvious and true by the vast majority of Americans, which obscures just how hard it was for McGovern to stand up and say so at the time.


As a junior senator, McGovern had the courage to call for withdrawal and negotiations early in his first term in office, while his own party, in control of the White House and Congress, supported the war. He says it took more guts to do that than to fly his bomber in World War II. His South Dakota constituents overwhelmingly supported the war at the time, so he assumed his principals would end his political career. Apparently the voters liked his principals more than he anticipated; he was re-elected to the Senate for a total of eighteen years. President Lyndon Johnson, McGovern’s fellow Democrat, banned him from the White House, and Nixon excoriated him ten years later as dangerously soft and out of touch. But McGovern wasn’t radical, he was correct – and he paid the price because he was right before the country was ready to hear it. It cost him the presidency.

And for that, he says, he bears not a single regret. He still considers his candidacy an honorable mission, one that did not sacrifice truth for expediency, and he remembers his acceptance speech at the chaotic Democratic convention in 1972 as one of his best. The theme: “Come home, America.”



While his opponent in the campaign, Nixon, ran a shipboard snack shack and made a fortune playing poker during his World War II stint in the Navy, McGovern served as an Army bomber pilot who flew thirty-five dangerous missions over North Africa and Europe aboard the lumbering, difficult, freezing and deafening B-24 Liberator. The airplanes had been manufactured so quickly and in such great numbers that they were deployed without heaters, without insulation for the noise, without windshield wipers. Pilots had to stick their heads out the window in order to see when the windshield was obscured. Half the pilots and crews McGovern flew with never made it home, as a full tour of duty meant flying thirty-five missions, while the average crew only made it to seventeen. His navigator and close friend never made it home, never made it to the seminary where he planned to become a Presbyterian minister. McGovern made it to the end of the war, then volunteered to fly extra missions delivering food and medicine to the European countryside, often to areas he had bombed just a few months before. He received the Distinguished Flying Cross for his bravery; he was twenty-one years old when he commanded his first mission.

Yet in his failed bid for president, McGovern rarely mentioned his war experience. And he paid the price at the polls, falsely painted as a pacifist incapable of being a strong commander in chief, simply because he didn’t think it was proper to trade on the fact that he did his duty during the war, risking his life many times over.

This, more than anything, separates leaders who never saw combat from those who have, and the World War II generation from their successors. He never campaigned as a "war leader," never strutted about after he reentered civilian life in uniforms or flight suits to gain political capital or to stage stirring photo opportunities. Instead, McGovern often argued that the blood of young Americans should be offered up only as a last resort, and his definition of leadership revolved around the ideas of duty and sacrifice and honor. These, he would recall, were the values that drove him, his friends, and 16 million other men and women -- one out of every eight Americans alive at the time -- to serve in World War II.

 “You know I didn't feel there was any other choice,” McGovern answers. “We were attacked at Pearl Harbor. The next day it was declared war on the United States. So we had no recourse except to get into service. I couldn't wait to sign up. We went to Omaha, ten of us from my little college. We didn't know whether to join the Army or the Navy. One of the guys picked up a rumor that if you went to the Army Air Corps recruiting station, they would give you a free meal ticket to a downtown cafeteria in Omaha. So on the strength of that unsubstantiated rumor and a ticket that was worth about a dollar, all ten of us joined up as Army Air Corps pilots.”



 McGovern shared two anecdotes about his war experience on Veterans Day in 2004, when a new World War II Memorial was dedicated in the nation's capitol.

The first involved a regret he had lived with for many years, his only regret in thirty-five successful bombing missions against Nazi strongholds. McGovern’s air group had been assigned the job of bombing an enormous and well-defended munitions plant Germany had constructed in Czechoslovakia. His plane, the Dakota Queen, nearly got shot down over the target, anti-aircraft rounds taking out two of its four engines. McGovern managed to complete the bombing run and turn his crippled plane for home, but then the crew told him one of the bombs was jammed in the rack, rattling around above the bomb bay doors, fully armed. If he tried to land, the plane would almost certainly blow up. So he dropped out of formation as the crew members frantically tried to loosen the huge explosive. Suddenly, it dropped free, and to McGovern’s horror, he watched it explode in the middle of a farm in the Austrian countryside, a peaceful civilian landscape, out of the war zone, shattered by this errant bomb at high noon. McGovern was devastated. On the very same day he learned his first child had been born back home, he feared he had just wiped out an innocent farm family sitting down to lunch. He carried the guilt of this around for decades, certain he could have done something different, something better.

Years later, he recounted the incident on Austrian television during a lecture trip. An elderly man called in after the broadcast and announced that he was the farmer McGovern had accidentally bombed, that he had seen the plane coming that day and hid in a ditch with his family. He wanted McGovern to know that everyone came through unscathed. And he added that he had despised Hitler, and that he had told his family that if having the farm bombed somehow sped the end of the war, it was all right. The memory still has the power to awe McGovern, and he says quietly, “I got redeemed after all those years.”

If anything crystallizes the difference between his G.I. Bill generation of leaders and their successors, it is this anecdote. In an era in which politicians believe their success rests on never admitting error and never saying, “I’m sorry,” the story that a genuine war hero wanted America to hear on Veterans Day was an admission of regret and redemption.

His other story is no less poignant, and he says it changed his life’s direction. This one took place on a troop ship entering the harbor in Naples. Italy had been devastated by the war. People were starving. As his ship approached the dock, McGovern could see children, dozens of them, lined up on the pier yelling in broken English: Baby Ruth, Butterfinger, Hershey Bar! McGovern and the other G.I.s started rummaging around for some treats to toss to the kids, but the captain said no, don’t throw anything to them. The day before, the same thing happened and the soldiers started throwing candy from the ship to the dock. Some of the bars fell in the water and the kids were so hungry and so desperate they dove in after them. Other kids just fell in the frantic scramble. Twenty-five children drowned in all that day, over a few candy bars. “That was my first introduction to human hunger,” McGovern says quietly. “And I have been interested in that hunger issue ever since.”

He has made that a signature issue throughout his career, most recently with the United Nations. In 2001, he was appointed to serve as the U.N. Global Ambassador on World Hunger, tirelessly working to establish school lunch programs for 300 hundred million of the world’s most desperately hungry children, and organizing conferences on the connection between world hunger and AIDS. AIDS medicine does not work without adequate nutrition, and so hunger has helped the epidemic to spread. 



Given his history, it is not surprising that McGovern also became a prominent critic of America’s first war of the twenty-first century, the Iraq war, his prescience about Vietnam and his background as a combat pilot giving him a unique platform. “I had thought… we never again would carry out a needless, ill-conceived invasion of another country that had done us no harm and posed no threat to our security,” he wrote in an impassioned essay in The Nation. “I was wrong in that assumption.”

Yet McGovern also proudly and approvingly pointed out that one of his granddaughters, at age nineteen, joined the Air Force Academy, saying, “Well Grandpa, it’s what you did.”

Makers & Takers vs The GI Bill

When Ronald Reagan convinced the nation that the nine most dangerous words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help, the Gipper knew better, even if his audience didn’t. Reagan was a member of the WW II generation and half his colleagues in Hollywood, from Newman to McQueen to Matthau, got their educations, training and first homes through the biggest of big government programs, the G.I. Bill.

Yet Reagan’s 1980s laugh line has become 21st century conventional wisdom, justification for slashing and spurning every government program in sight and, more recently, for constructing false and divisive labels about America being a land of good "makers" and bad "takers." This is a good time to recall that the generation that fought World War II,  memorably described by Tom Brokaw as "the Greatest Generation," didn't just serve their country. They also happily took more government aide, support and incentives than any other generation in the history of the world. And the United States is better, stronger and more prosperous because of it.

WW II vets register at Indiana University.
Consider what happened immediately after World War II ended: Millions of veterans lined up for hours, sometimes days, to register for free college educations, to buy homes with no money down and mortgages cheaper than rent, to sign up for vocational training and job counseling, and to apply for business and farm loans -- all courtesy of Uncle Sam and the original, epically generous G.I. Bill. The U.S. needed jobs, an educated work force, new industries, new products, new businesses and new housing, and the G.I. Bill, at great cost that has proved to be the most productive investment in history, jumpstarted it all, turning America into the world's first true super power.

Just imagine how a politician today would be pilloried if he proposed offering an entire generation free college, subsidized mortgages, job training and medical care. Why that would be a costly boondoggle, outright social engineering – it would violate Reagan’s dictum that government isn’t the solution, it’s the problem. Today’s unthinkable, however, was yesterday’s matter of course.

In the midst of war, two politically polar opposites -- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and the American Legion -- joined forces to push Congress to pass the bipartisan G.I. Bill to aid 16 million veterans. That was 1 out of 8 Americans living at the time, most of a generation. The stated goal was to help vets rebuild their lives after war. But this investment in America’s future powered far more than a return to the status quo. It transformed the nation and the American Dream. It opened up the colleges that were formerly elite bastions (and kept them open ever after). It raised suburbs out of bean fields so a nation of renters became a nation of homeowners. It grew the middle class from 1 in 10 before the war to 1 in 3 a decade after. And it provided a legion of educated men and women to provide the medical, engineering and scientific prowess to conquer dread diseases, usher in the information age, and win the Cold War.

Such luminaries as Bob Dole, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, William Rehnquist, Warren Christopher, Gerald Ford, George H.W. Bush, and George McGovern, among many others, got their starts with help from the World War II G.I. Bill, as did 14 Nobel Prize winners, two dozen Pulitzer Prize winners, 238,000 teachers, 91,000 scientists, 67,000 doctors, 450,000 engineers and a million assorted lawyers, nurses, businessmen, artists, actors, writers and pilots. Bob Taylor, a key creator of ARPAnet, the government funded project that became a little thing called the Internet, was G.I. Bill-educated (aftger serving in Korea). We seem to have forgotten that it was not unfettered free markets that transformed postwar America so much as a massive government program that intervened mightily in the housing, lending and education businesses, pushing (and subsidizing) them in ways they had long resisted – spreading the wealth as never before. Or since.

Costly? Sure, but the G.I. Bill was truly a hand-up, not a hand-out, as those who took the benefits ended up giving so much more back. The bill itself more than paid for itself. A 1988 congressional study found that every dollar spent on education under the bill returned $7 through increased productivity, higher wages, consumer spending and tax revenue. Fifty billion (in today’s dollars) earned a $350 billion return. The G.I. Bill left America safer, stronger, more united, and more prosperous. That’s called investing in the future, and supporting what the Founders would have called the commonwealth.

The creators of the original G.I. Bill understood that it would have power to transform America because it touched most of a whole generation. There is nothing like it today. Yes, there is still a G.I. Bill, but given the small percentage of the population in military service, fewer than 1% of Americans will receive those benefits, which in any case are not nearly as generous as the original. The G.I. Bill will never again be the sweeping engine of opportunity and prosperity that it was for America's Greatest Generation and the entire country. And America needs such an engine.

Before he died, FDR proposed a solution: national service. Young people would do good while earning education, medical, housing and pension benefits -- not just veterans, but everyone who pitched in to serve the commonwealth, a civilian GI Bill. National service could be used to rebuild crumbling infrastructure, expand the ranks of teachers, increase public health services, retrofit the country for money-saving energy efficiency -- investments that could yield dividends for generations and end the scourge of high unemployment. Polls suggested a receptive public when the immensely popular FDR proposed it, but the idea died with him. Bill Clinton tried a modest resurrection with his AmeriCorps project. Much more would be needed.

In an era when college is a growing financial burden for families, when home ownership grows less affordable each day, when the U.S. is losing its competitive edge in advanced degrees, and when the American Dream so generously nurtured after World War II is under siege, it is time again to expect greatness from our government – our common enterprise, our commonwealth. It is time to realize Reagan’s old saw was not truism but self-fulfilling prophecy. Before he convinced us otherwise, our American government bested the Great Depression, created Social Security, won WW II, ended racial segregation, eradicated the scourges of polio and small pox, harnessed the atom, put a man on the moon, rebuilt war-ravaged Europe and Japan with the Marshall Plan, and raised America to new heights by opening college and homeownership to a majority of Americans through the visionary G.I. Bill. Such is the legacy of greatness we inherited, the accomplishments of wise and bipartisan government. We all built that.

Now, for the first time in our history, polls show that Americans expect their children to inherit less prosperous lives than the current generation. This is a direct result of our embrace of those nine dangerous words, of seeing the commonwealth as a taking, when is fact it is all about making America better and stronger. Which legacy shall we leave behind?

Our Dirty Love Affair With Trash

The head of a plastic bag industry group, whose full-time job consists of battling local bans on disposable grocery sacks, made a provocative observation to me about trash recently: Don't be so quick to reject waste, he warned.

"Zero waste would mean a zero economy."

Equating green with economic ruin is a familiar refrain, of course, but this claim about waste is worth a hard look. Trash really is the biggest thing Americans make, and it tends to get bigger in good times while shrinking during recession. Does that mean, as counter-intuitive as it sounds, that garbage is good? Should the old saw about waste not, want not really be waste more, get more? Should Americans just chill out and revel in the fact that we are the most wasteful people on the planet, rolling to the curb 7.1 pounds of trash a day for every man, woman and child -- a personal lifetime legacy of 102 tons of garbage each? Doesn't that just show that we're buying lots of stuff and living large -- that we should throw ourselves into a dirty love affair with trash?

Just the opposite. After immersing in the world of Garbology for the last year and a half I’ve learned some shocking truths about the high costs of our garbage. Here are some numbers to consider:
Americans make twice as much waste per person as in 1960. Most of the increase is from "instant trash' -- packaging, wraps, containers and bags, the biggest component of our garbage these days.

Garbage is our No. 1 export. Not computers, cars or planes. Our biggest export is the scrap paper and metal that China turns into products and packaging, which they sell back to us. America has turned itself into China's trash compactor.

Many American communities pay more for waste management than for parks and recreation, fire protection or school textbooks. 

The average American makes 7.1 pounds of trash a day, according to the best available data (from a biannual surveys of American landfills by Columbia University and the journal BioCycle). That compares to 2.5 pounds per person in Japan. 

The U.S Mail is more than half junk mail, 85 billion pieces weighing 4 million tons last year (about one out of every 100 pounds sent to the landfill). We subsidize junk mail with an artificially low postal rate and by excusing the creators of this unwanted waste product from cleaning up their own mess. 

America sends 69% of its municipal solid waste to landfills. By comparison, the Netherlands and Austria landfill 1% of their trash, Sweden, 2%, Belgium and Denmark, 4%. Germany claims zero landfilling. Those countries recycle at two to three times the rate of the U.S., and make energy with the rest of the refuse. We, on the other hand, make geographic features out of our trash.
Waste is a cost, not an economic engine. Businesses understand this -- Wal-Mart has reduced its landfilling in California by 80% and ramping up recycling and reusing to the point that waste is not a profit center instead of a cost. Families know it too: Artist Bea Johnson of Marin County has presided over her family's commitment to buying unpackaged bulk goods, refusing plastic and disposable products, selecting used and refurbished items, and buying more wisely, with a focus on durability and need rather than disposability and impulse purchases. It's not enough to reuse and recycle, Johnson says. "You have to refuse!"

The Johnsons' household expenses have dropped by 40%, making college funds, a hybrid car and cool vacations possible. Their non-recycled, non-compostable trash fits in a mason jar -- for the year.

 Zero waste doesn't mean zero economy. It means a different economy, with different winners. And fewer mountains of garbage.

Cross-posted at Bagmonster.com